Topic category: Government/Politics
Congresswoman Shelley Berkley shows courage
I just had to take time to give accolades where accolades are due. Congresswoman Berkley has taken a position that puts her at odds with the current administration, which is ran by her own party. That takes courage to go up against an occupant of the White House who is a member of her own party.
The administration is working towards imposing a two-state "solution" on Israel. The so-called "road map" calls for an end to even "natural growth." What that means is that if you are an Israeli, you can't build a house, hospital, factory, etc. "Natural growth" is a euphemism for economic development. It seems to me that we should be encouraging the most capable individuals of making productive use of land, no matter their religious tradition and ethnic origin. I agree with the Congresswoman in her opposition to this "road map."
It is important to understand that this "road map" is not new. In fact, I wrote about this "road map" back in 2003, when it was first concocted. It is also important to understand that the entire Middle Eastern foreign policy of the U.S. is nexused with this two-state "solution." In my commentary, I predicted that the supporters of Israel would be betrayed by the final "solution," which is carving out Israel pursuant to United Nations Security Council Resolution 242 (or maybe even 181).
The main argument of my commentary that I wrote in 2003 is that our foreign policy is leading towards imposing this two-state "solution" on Israel, and that - no matter how many sins may have been committed against Palestinians during Israel's genesis - the past can't be undone. It is wrong for the U.S. government to occupy Iraq, and it is wrong for the U.S. government to favor reconstructing Israeli settlements, and to curtail new Israeli settlements.
On a peripheral note, I haven't submitted articles to AntiWar.com for several years because I noticed that AntiWar.com is not so much anti-interventionism/anti-war as it is anti-Israel. On the matter of AntiWar.com, I find myself in agreement with Jared Israel of www.emperors-clothes.com, who I believe had been strategically allied with Raimondo's AntiWar.com at one time. Proving just that, I noticed that AntiWar.com linked to this piece of garbage commentary right here. Where one stands on the two-state "solution," I believe, tells us whether that person supports a foreign policy of non-interventionism or opposes Israel. On the two-state "solution" issue, throw me into AIPAC's briar patch.
Biography - Mark Alvarez
Mark served honorably for four years on active duty in the Marine Corps infantry. He went up for a board which required having to answer several questions about Marine Corps knowledge and received a meritorious promotion while in the Marine Corps. He received the Good Conduct Medal on his three year mark. He was a Libertarian endorsed candidate for a municipal office in 2002. He re-enlisted in the ARNG in 2006 because he missed the military and was honorably discharged. He would have liked to have stayed in the ARNG longer and deployed, but the VA's faux medical charting made that nearly impossible. He stood on principle refusing to take anything from the taxpayer to go to school. He started Veterans for Ron Paul in 2007 (contrary to the claims somebody else started it). He has held the NFA Series 3 license (futures and futures options broker) which he did a voluntary withdrawal on because he couldn't in good conscience sell managed futures, which are designed for institutional clients, since firms would do better to hire an in-house trader to trade a proprietary account with a discount broker rather than allocating assets into a managed futures account, which he outlined in his well-written withdrawal request. He's proud to say that he never bagged a single client for MF Global because if he had bagged a client it would have been for MF Global. Since the year 2000, he has spent much of his free time reading the great minds of the Austrian School of economics, such as Murray Rothbard, Henry Hazlitt, Ludwig von Mises, et al.