With the cost of a barrel of crude oil edging toward $100 (remember the good old days when it was only $70?), it’s time to look at the gas tax. In August, the Cato Institute published a “Policy Analysis” that was titled, “Don’t Increase Federal Gasoline Taxes—Abolish Them.”
With the cost of a barrel of crude oil edging toward $100 (remember the good old days when it was only $70?), it’s time to look at the gas tax. In August, the Cato Institute published a “Policy Analysis” that was titled, “Don’t Increase Federal Gasoline Taxes—Abolish Them.”
Masters of turgid prose, Jerry Taylor and Peter Van Doren, Cato senior fellows authored sixteen pages of a tightly reasoned argument against raising the taxes on gasoline, plus seven small-print pages of footnotes documenting their position. A prodigious amount of scholarly effort was invested in this analysis.
Fortunately for me, there was an “Executive Summary” on page one that helped to identify the major themes. “Gasoline consumption does not necessarily distort American foreign policy, impose military commitments, or empower Islamic terrorists organizations,” say the authors.
“State and federal gasoline taxes should be abolished.” That’s the kind of thing that catches my attention.
I was thinking about it the other day as I drove a short distance on New Jersey’s Route 280, a testament to potholes and the ruination of roadways imposed by a combination of Mother Nature and relentless commuters. As a lad in the 1960’s, I was the editor of a weekly newspaper and recall watching the highway’s construction. Why, I wondered, wasn’t this roadway being maintained properly?
Then I remembered that I was, after all, in New Jersey! Spending money on highway repair is far less glamorous than creating more entitlement programs and borrowing into the next century to pay the pension demands of teachers and other civil servants.
You just have to like people like Taylor and Van Doren who say things like, “In fact, we find no compelling reason for a federal gasoline tax at all and call for its repeal. Nor do we find any compelling case for state gasoline taxes.”
According to the American Petroleum Institute, “The nationwide average tax on gasoline is 45.8 cents per gallon as of March 2007, up 0.3 cents from October 2006…the federal tax on gasoline is 18.4 cents per gallon. The average state gasoline excise tax remained consistent at 18.2 cents per gallon.” Other taxes such as sales, oil inspection, underground storage tank, and miscellaneous environmental fees add 9.15 cents per gallon to the average tax. Do the arithmetic.
Taxes differ, however, from state to state. New York extracts 60.8 cents per gallon, while Arizona takes only 37.4.
One of the common arguments for taxes is that the world is running out of oil, but they note this concern is based “on shaky ground…concerns that conventional crude oil is becoming scarce in any meaningful sense have not withstood close scrutiny.”
They go on to note that our frequently cited “dependency” on oil imported from “unstable countries” is the result of a conscious decision to continue this practice because it is, in fact, cheaper in many ways.
To those politicians calling for higher taxes to force people to drive less, conserve energy, or switch to solar or wind power, “government solutions have the dubious distinction of being more expensive not just most of the time, but all of the time.”
Citing the price fixing in the 1970s when the government wanted to reduce import dependency, the authors note that, “Consumers were made worse off as a consequence.” Anyone who remembers the long lines at gas stations can testify to that.
Listening to George W. Bush say that we are “addicted” to oil makes about as much sense as saying we are addicted to water.
The Greens have, as long as my memory serves, hated gasoline as much as DDT. We instinctively know that taxing gasoline “will not discourage highway congestion and reduce accidents on the roadway.” And common sense tells us, “A national emissions tax would be inefficient because it would ignore the large geographic variation in damages associated with pollution.” That is to say that Los Angeles gets more than, say, Bozeman, Montana.
“Many foreign policy analysts think that U.S. oil imports are dependent on friendly relationships with oil-producing states. The fear is that unfriendly regimes might not sell us oil.” Well, tell that to Hugo Chavez in Venezuela or Iran’s Mahmoud Ahmadinejad whose economy is dependent on selling oil and not influenced by whether they think George W. Bush is the Devil Incarnate.
Moreover, “The fact that Saudi Arabia and Kuwait paid for 55 percent of the cost of Operation Desert Storm suggests that keeping the Straits of Harmuz free of trouble is certainly within their means.” To those who say we are in Iraq because of that nation’s oil, the memory of 9/11 has grown very dim indeed. We are also in Afghanistan, a nation famous for its heroin, not oil production. Keeping one’s eye on the ball, i.e., terrorism fueled by Islamic fanaticism, is essential when all manner of spurious reasons are given to raise taxes on gasoline.
“Once oil leaves the territory of a producer, market agents dictate where the oil goes, not agents of the producer, and anyone willing to pay the prevailing world crude oil price can have all he wants.”
What gasoline taxes do is “extract revenue” and this is what politicians live for. It has little to do with whether it makes any sense for Americans to be paying taxes on an energy source that is absolutely essential to our daily lives and the welfare of the national economy.
If I thought the potholes on Route 280 would actually be fixed, I wouldn’t mind that much about the gasoline tax I pay every time I fill up the tank, but I stopped believing in the Tooth Fairy along about the time I concluded that government is a confiscatory enterprise with little concern for my well being or wallet.
Alan Caruba passed on June 15, 2015. His keen wit, intellect, and desire to see that "right" be done will be missed by all who his life touched. His archives will remain available online at this site.
Alan Caruba was the founder of The National Anxiety Center, a clearinghouse for information about media-driven scare campaigns designed to influence public opinion and policy. A veteran public relations counselor and professional writer, Caruba emerged as a conservative voice through his weekly column, "Warning Signs", posted on the Center's Internet site (www.anxietycenter.com) and widely excerpted on leading sites including this one.
A member of the Society of Professional Journalists, the American Society of Journalists and Authors, and a charter member of the National Book Critics Circle, Caruba applied a wide-ranging knowledge of business, science, history and other topics to his examination of issues that included protecting our national sovereignty, environment and immigration, education and international affairs.
Caruba resided in New Jersey and had served in the US Army, had been an advisor to corporations, trade associations, universities, and others who used his public relations skills for many years. He maintained a business site at www.caruba.com.
Caruba performed many reviews of both fiction and non-fiction at Bookviews.Com, a popular site for news about books of merit that do not necessarily make it to the mainstream bestseller lists.
Cover
•
Commentary
•
Books & Reviews
•
Climate Change
•
Site Links
•
Feedback
