Commentaries, Global Warming, Opinions   Cover   •   Commentary   •   Books & Reviews   •   Climate Change   •   Site Links   •   Feedback
"And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free." - John 8:32
WEBCommentary Contributor
Author:  Michael J. Gaynor
Bio: Michael J. Gaynor
Date:  January 25, 2008
Print article - Printer friendly version

Email article link to friend(s) - Email a link to this article to friends

Facebook - Facebook

Topic category:  Other/General


If any conservative somehow needed MORE to realize that McCain is not fit to be President, Ann offered it, by making the case that in 2000 McCain ran a dirty campaign by accusing the Bush campaign of dirty tricks and attacking Reverends Jerry Falwell and Pat Robertson.

Ann Coulter did take her sweet time before endorsing Mitt Romney for President, but she's been making up for it quickly.

First, as I detailed in an earlier article, Ann demolished the Huck (the One State Wonder who won the Iowa Republican Caucus).

Tough luck, Huck.

Soon after, the media named John McCain the Republican frontrunner, so Ann just left him drawn and quartered, in "'STRAIGHT TALK' EXPRESS TAKES SCENIC ROUTE TO TRUTH."

Actually. the title is too generous to McCain, since the article depicts McCain as deliberately untruthful, not slow to discover the truth.

A minor error in a magnificent piece that should be read by everyone.

Ann: "John McCain is Bob Dole minus the charm, conservatism and youth. Like McCain, pollsters assured us that Dole was the most 'electable' Republican. Unlike McCain, Dole didn't lie all the time while claiming to engage in Straight Talk."

Ann's right! The Republican Party does not owe McCain a presidential nomination. War hero Dole lost to the Clintons, and so would the former POW who is now 71 years old.

Ann was not fooled by McCain's straight-talk talk.

In addition to diagnosing McCain as a deceiver, Ann devastatingly explained why.


"Of course, I might lie constantly too, if I were seeking the Republican presidential nomination after enthusiastically promoting amnesty for illegal aliens, Social Security credit for illegal aliens, criminal trials for terrorists, stem-cell research on human embryos, crackpot global warming legislation and free speech-crushing campaign-finance laws.

"I might lie too, if I had opposed the Bush tax cuts, a marriage amendment to the Constitution, waterboarding terrorists and drilling in Alaska.

"And I might lie if I had called the ads of the Swift Boat Veterans for Truth 'dishonest and dishonorable.'"

Bottom line: Republicans should nominate a real Republican, not a RINO (Republican in Name Only) like the termperamental maverick McCain.

Illegal immigration is very important to Ann, so she highlighted McCain's as squishy soft of it.


"McCain angrily denounces the suggestion that his 'comprehensive immigration reform' constituted 'amnesty' -- on the ludicrous grounds that it included a small fine. Even the guy who graduated fifth from the bottom of his class at the U.S. Naval Academy didn't fall for this a few years ago.

"In 2003, McCain told The Tucson Citizen that 'amnesty has to be an important part' of any immigration reform....

"McCain's amnesty bill would have immediately granted millions of newly legalized immigrants Social Security benefits. He even supported allowing work performed as an illegal to count toward Social Security benefits as recently as a vote in 2006 -- now adamantly denied by Mr. Straight Talk."

In a recent debate McCain said he had never supported amnesty.


McCain is so old that he was in Congress when the amnesty bill was passed by Congress and signed by President Reagan.

Did McCain vote against it?

I don't think so.

Did McCain laud it?

Check the record.

Did McCain lie when he said he had never supported amnesty, or is he so old that he forgot?

Either way, McCain's not presidential material.

Likewise, McCain's revisionist history relating to the liberation of Iraq is hardly actual straight talk.


"McCain keeps boasting that he was 'the only one' of the Republican presidential candidates who supported the surge in Iraq.

"What is he talking about? All Republicans supported the surge -- including Mitt Romney and Rudy Giuliani. The only ones who didn't support it were McCain pals like Sen. Chuck Hagel. Indeed, the surge is the first part of the war on terrorism that caused McCain to break from Hagel in order to support the president.

"True, McCain voted for the war. So did Hillary Clinton. Like her, he then immediately started attacking every other aspect of the war on terrorism. (The only difference was, he threw in frequent references to his experience as a POW, which currently outnumber John Kerry's references to being a Vietnam vet.)"

Ann, a lawyer, is revolted by some of the legal positions of McCain, who is not a lawyer.


"...McCain joined with the Democrats in demanding O.J. trials for terrorists at Guantanamo, including his demand that the terrorists have full access to the intelligence files being used to prosecute them.

"These days, McCain gives swashbuckling speeches about the terrorists who 'will follow us home.' But he still opposes dripping water down their noses. He was a POW, you know. Also a member of the Keating 5 scandal, which you probably don't know, and won't -- until he becomes the Republican nominee."

Tax policy?

Ann doesn't trust McCain.


"...McCain...does have the distinction of being the only Republican who voted against the Bush tax cuts. (Also the little lamented Sen. Lincoln Chafee, who later left the Republican Party.) Now McCain claims he opposed the tax cuts because they didn't include enough spending cuts. But that wasn't what he said at the time.

"To the contrary, in 2001, McCain said he was voting against Bush's tax cuts based on the idiotic talking point of the Democrats. 'I cannot in good conscience,' McCain said, 'support a tax cut in which so many of the benefits go to the most fortunate among us at the expense of middle-class Americans who need tax relief.'"

That's not a demand for spending cuts by McCain.

If any conservative somehow needed MORE to realize that McCain is not fit to be President, Ann offered it, by making the case that in 2000 McCain ran a dirty campaign by accusing the Bush campaign of dirty tricks and attacking Reverends Jerry Falwell and Pat Robertson.


"McCain started and fanned the vicious anti-Bush myth that, before the 2000 South Carolina primary, the Bush campaign made phone calls to voters calling McCain a 'liar, cheat and a fraud' and accusing him of having an illegitimate black child.

"On the thin reed of a hearsay account, McCain immediately blamed the calls on Bush. 'I'm calling on my good friend George Bush,' McCain said, 'to stop this now. He comes from a better family. He knows better than this.'

"Bush denied that his campaign had anything to do with the alleged calls and, in a stunningly magnanimous act, ordered his campaign to release the script of the calls being made in South Carolina.

"Bush asked McCain to do the same for his calls implying that Bush was an anti-Catholic bigot, but McCain refused. Instead, McCain responded with a campaign commercial calling Bush a liar on the order of Bill Clinton:

MCCAIN: His ad twists the truth like Clinton. We're all pretty tired of that.

ANNOUNCER: Do we really want another politician in the White House America can't trust?

"After massive investigations by the Los Angeles Times and investigative reporter Byron York, among others, it turned out that neither of the alleged calls had been made by the Bush campaign -- nor, it appeared, by anyone else. There was no evidence that any such calls had ever been made, which is unheard of when hundreds of thousands of 'robo-calls' are being left on answering machines across the state.

"And yet, to this day, the media weep with McCain over Bush's underhanded tactics in the 2000 South Carolina primary.

"In fact, the most vicious attack in the 2000 South Carolina primary came from McCain -- and not against his opponent.

"Seeking even more favorable press from The New York Times, McCain launched an unprovoked attack against the Rev. Jerry Falwell and Pat Robertson, calling them 'agents of intolerance.' Unlike the phantom 'black love child' calls, there's documentary evidence of this smear campaign.

"To ensure he would get full media coverage for that little gem, McCain alerted the networks in advance that he planned to attack their favorite whipping boys. Newspaper editors across the country stood in awe of McCain's raw bravery. The New York Times praised him in an editorial that said the Republican Party 'has for too long been tied to the cramped ideology of the Falwells and the Robertsons.'"

Finally, McCain is not nearly pro-life enough (as former Senator Ric Santorum has explained).

Ann: "Though McCain generally votes pro-life -- as his Arizona constituency requires -- he embraces the loony lingo of the pro-abortion set, repeatedly assuring his pals in the media that he opposes the repeal of Roe v. Wade because it would force women to undergo 'illegal and dangerous operations.'"

Ann facetiously concluded: "Come to think of it, Dole is a million times better than McCain. Why not run him again?"

Dole being older that McCain, and McCain being too old, the answer is...Dole's too old!

Thankfully, Ann found Mitt to be the best presidential fit and is backing him with all her wisdom and wit.

Too late to help in Iowa, but perfect to put Mitt on top in the much more important winner-take-all state of Florida and pave the way for his nomination and election.

Michael J. Gaynor

Send email feedback to Michael J. Gaynor

Biography - Michael J. Gaynor

Michael J. Gaynor has been practicing law in New York since 1973. A former partner at Fulton, Duncombe & Rowe and Gaynor & Bass, he is a solo practitioner admitted to practice in New York state and federal courts and an Association of the Bar of the City of New York member.

Gaynor graduated magna cum laude, with Honors in Social Science, from Hofstra University's New College, and received his J.D. degree from St. John's Law School, where he won the American Jurisprudence Award in Evidence and served as an editor of the Law Review and the St. Thomas More Institute for Legal Research. He wrote on the Pentagon Papers case for the Review and obscenity law for The Catholic Lawyer and edited the Law Review's commentary on significant developments in New York law.

The day after graduating, Gaynor joined the Fulton firm, where he focused on litigation and corporate law. In 1997 Gaynor and Emily Bass formed Gaynor & Bass and then conducted a general legal practice, emphasizing litigation, and represented corporations, individuals and a New York City labor union. Notably, Gaynor & Bass prevailed in the Second Circuit in a seminal copyright infringement case, Tasini v. New York Times, against newspaper and magazine publishers and Lexis-Nexis. The U.S. Supreme Court affirmed, 7 to 2, holding that the copyrights of freelance writers had been infringed when their work was put online without permission or compensation.

Gaynor currently contributes regularly to,,, and and has contributed to many other websites. He has written extensively on political and religious issues, notably the Terry Schiavo case, the Duke "no rape" case, ACORN and canon law, and appeared as a guest on television and radio. He was acknowledged in Until Proven Innocent, by Stuart Taylor and KC Johnson, and Culture of Corruption, by Michelle Malkin. He appeared on "Your World With Cavuto" to promote an eBay boycott that he initiated and "The World Over With Raymond Arroyo" (EWTN) to discuss the legal implications of the Schiavo case. On October 22, 2008, Gaynor was the first to report that The New York Times had killed an Obama/ACORN expose on which a Times reporter had been working with ACORN whistleblower Anita MonCrief.

Gaynor's email address is

Read other commentaries by Michael J. Gaynor.

Copyright 2008 by Michael J. Gaynor
All Rights Reserved.

[ Back ]

© 2004-2021 by WEBCommentary(tm), All Rights Reserved