Topic category: Other/General
Robert Nixon, alias Thomas Crosby: The Racist Serial Murderer/Rapist; How Long before He Gets “Exonerated,” and His Relatives Get Paid “Reparations”?
A fraction of Robert Nixon, alias Thomas Crosby’s (all-white) victims
Mrs. H. W. Koll January 25, 1937 “attacked” (typically a euphemism for raped);
Elizabeth Reis February 3, 1937 “fractured her skull” (L.A.);
Rose Valdez March 2, 1937 raped and murdered (L.A.);
Edna A. Worden (age 48) and her daughter, Marguerite Estelle Worden (12) April 4, 1937 raped and murdered both (L.A.);
Zoe Damrell March 28, 1937 “attacked and nearly murdered” (he raped her and committed attempted murder);
Anna Kuchta raped and murdered 1937 (Chicago); and
Florence Johnson May 27, 1938 (murdered).
Robert Nixon, alias Thomas Crosby, raped some 22 white females, committed attempted murder against two, and murdered six white females.
In today’s America of factual and moral reversals, in a few generations, or more recently, just a few years, a man can go from a racist, serial murderer and rapist to an “exonerated,” racial martyr/hero, due for “reparations,” if he is evil enough, and of the right race.
For example, in the various editions of Andrew Hacker’s book, first published in 1992, Two Nations: White, Black, Separate, Hostile, Unequal, Hacker speaks of O.J. Simpson, Mike Tyson, and Larry Davis as victims of “racism,” i.e., White racism, as that’s the only kind of racism for Hacker. For Hacker, the fact that O.J. Simpson butchered two white people is irrelevant. White “racism” got him tried for his victims’ murders. (But O.J. got off!) In the case of Mike Tyson, white people had nothing to do with his being charged with rape. Tyson was accused by beauty queen Desiree Washington, who was black, but Hacker never mentions that fact. And in the case of Larry Davis, Hacker tells us that Davis was acquitted at trial by “Bronx householders.” What on Earth was that supposed to mean?! The phrase, “Bronx householders,” was meant to deceive readers into thinking that these were homeowners. All “householders” means is that they weren’t homeless. (The jurors who acquitted Emmitt Till’s killers were actual home owners, but Hacker doesn’t tell his readers that.) Hacker further deceived readers by withholding from them that Larry Davis was a serial killer, who had robbed and murdered six Bronx drug dealers.
Back in early 2000, when I first got access to the Internet, I learned that Hacker’s book was the bestselling social science book at my undergraduate alma mater, SUNY Stony Brook. That was, however, a meaningless fake stat, since virtually no students voluntarily bought his book. Its buyers constituted a captive audience, who were forced to pay for it by their professors. (A few may have bought the book because they saw it in the school bookstore, but they only saw it, due to professors having ordered it, and forced it on their captive audience.)
In Part I, I talked about the many murders (at least six), attempted murders (at least two), and completed rapes (at least 22), all of white girls and women, committed between 1936 and 1938 by racist, black, serial killer/rapist Robert Nixon, alias Thomas Crosby.
In his 1940 Columbia university lecture, “How Bigger was Born,” Richard Wright said that there were five real black males who inspired him to write his murderous, black monster, “Bigger Thomas,” in his 1940 novel, Native Son (but NOT serial killer/rapist Robert Nixon, alias Thomas Crosby!). All were either boys or young men. All were thugs. But Richard Wright didn’t create Bigger Thomas out of revulsion towards the five Biggers. He embraced them! He speaks, for instance, of a young black who got on the bus without paying, and when the white driver sought to collect his fare from him, pulled a knife on him, and dared him to collect the fare. Wright simply assumed that the other black riders loved seeing a black man stick it to a white. Never mind that the thug would spend his life overwhelmingly harming blacks. If he occasionally humiliated or harmed a white, Wright forgave him all his crimes against blacks.
Of Robert Nixon, alias Thomas Crosby, Wright said that he paraphrased or quoted outright Chicago news reports on Nixon’s crimes in his novel, but does not editorialize at all, the way Chicago Tribune columnist Ron Grossman does today about the press coverage. Grossman is even more pc, if that’s possible, than Wright!
However, Wright and Grossman both eliminated over 90% of Nixon/Crosby’s savage crimes.
Writing in his Chicago Tribune column in 2018, Grossman did accurately quote the aforementioned passage in which Wright dishonestly asserted that the police were constantly picking up random, innocent blacks, charging them with rape, and getting them to confess to anything they wanted.
That was a blood libel, the kind that comes second nature to black supremacists like Richard Wright and white media monsters like Ron Grossman. To that end, Ron Grossman withheld from his readers that the police in Chicago and Los Angeles cracked the case, and determined that Nixon and Crosby were the same man, through forensics: a fingerprint.
Although Wright did charge the fictional Bigger Thomas with two murders (though he tried to sell the first as accidental), he had a fall-back out: White racism is so pervasive and powerful that it “causes” black men like Bigger to commit heinous crimes, without whites doing anything to them. And Wright withheld from his listeners the great quantity of Nixon/Crosby’s heinous crimes.
Thus, Wright and Grossman insinuated that all violent, racist, black criminals are innocent.
(In 1998, sociologist Scott Cummings wrote of a series of savage, racially motivated rape-murders by black teenagers of three octogenarian and nonagenarian White women, that the crimes were “caused” by “discrimination, inequality, and poverty.” If Cummings sounds cold-blooded and racist, at least he didn’t praise the rapist-murderers. A colleague of his celebrated the atrocities, saying that the white victims were “racist,” and thus deserved their fates.
At amazon.com, a racist customer-reviewer claiming to be a college instructor lied, saying that Cummings’ research failed.
Reviewed in the United States on November 10, 2011
“Cummings attempts to chronicle the experiences of elderly whites in an urban space. Sadly he provides an ethnocentric portrait of troubled views without directly confronting racism embedded in both the systemic processes as well as among the elderly residents. Even the author’s terminology (such as ‘black invasion’) call into question his ability to objectively research this challenging subject. I used the book once in my college class, but will not in the future.”
Urbanresearcher wrote not a review, but a hit job that alternates between academese (“urban space,” “systemic processes”) and racist hatred. His lies start with word two: “attempted.” Cummings didn’t attempt to chronicle the experiences of elderly urban whites, he did, in fact, chronicle their experiences. What Urbanresearcher condemns as “an ethnocentric portrait of troubled views” is simply Cummings showing compassion towards the white victims of blood-curdling, black racism, including black teenagers raping and slaughtering octogenarian and nonagenarian, white women. And what on Earth were the victims’ “troubled views”? Urbanresearcher doesn’t explain his meaning, because he can’t. He is full of racist hatred for the whites who had built and maintained the neighborhood, simply because they were white, and of joyous loyalty for the racist blacks who were robbing, raping, and murdering them.
When Urbanresearcher says, “Even the author’s terminology (such as ‘black invasion’) call into question his ability to objectively research this challenging subject,” he’s lying like a Persian rug. What he is really thinking is, ‘Cummings failed to show unconditional loyalty towards the racist black cut-throats; therefore, I shall condemn him.’ And there was nothing “challenging” about the subject.
Urbanresearcher has no concept whatsoever of objective research. In his world, there are only friends and enemies.
“Rosedale” referred to the Polytechnic Heights neighborhood of Fort Worth.
[Scott Cummings, Left Behind in Rosedale, 1998.])
Richard Wright was one of the godfathers of the racial profiling hoax, and the notion later popularized by the murder cult, the Nation of Islam, that no black is obliged to obey “the white man’s laws.”
I wish I could say that Ron Grossman is unique, but he is a model of the banality of media evil. University j-schools churn out Ron Grossmans assembly-line style. If a journalism student reveals any honest or decent tendencies, he gets defamed and expelled, the way black supremacist journalism professor Tracy Owens Patton of the University of Iowa defamed and expelled student Jay Gardner already over 20 years ago. (Teacher ed schools function the same way.)
Presently, Wikipedia, the msm, and the antiversity are all equally dishonest and evil. Long ago, a Gleichschaltung was imposed.
‘Twasn’t always so. Consider the reportage on Nixon/Crosby in 1938, which Grossman condemns. The language was very strong, and in my liberal past, I am sure I would also have condemned it. Now I believe that it is commendable. Decent people of all levels of education ought to react to a Robert Nixon with outrage. It is the people like Richard Wright and Ron Grossman who are the perverse ones, the evil racists.
And yet, it gets even better!
Robert Nixon and Police Torture in Chicago, 1871–1971, by Elizabeth Dale (2016) Cornell University Press promo blurb: “To show why the criminal justice system failed to adequately deal with many of those allegations of police torture, Dale examines one case in particular, the 1938 trial of Robert Nixon for murder. Nixon’s case is famous for being the basis [sic] for the novel Native Son, by Richard Wright. Dale considers the part of Nixon’s account that Wright left out of his story: Nixon’s claims that he confessed after being strung up by his wrists and beaten and the legal system’s treatment of those claims.
“Markus Nehl is a scholar who has written about Richard Wright’s Native Son (1940): • “Handbook of the American Novel
“Nehl’s essay ‘Richard Wright, Native Son (1940)’ appears in Handbook of the American Novel of the Twentieth and Twenty-First Centuries (2017).
Elizabeth Dale promoted the falsehood, whereby Richard Wright was “inspired” to write Native Son by the case of Robert Nixon, alias Thomas Crosby, and Markus Nehl and Ron Grossman repeated her lie, without checking it out. (Long ago, the Chicago News Bureau used to train reporters for all of the city’s dailies, teaching them things like, “If your mother says she loves you, check it out!”)
[Richard Ciccone, Royko: A Life in Print, 2001.]
More importantly, Elizabeth Dale promoted the blood libel, whereby the problem in Chicago wasn’t black cut-throats (many of whom racially targeted white victims), but racist, white cops who tortured innocent blacks into confessing to crimes. Thus, Nixon, alias Crosby, wasn’t the murderer of at least six white females, the attempted murderer of at least two additional white females, and the rapist of at least 22 white females, he was a poor black victim, who needs to be exonerated, and his relatives paid millions of dollars in reparations.
“Allies” like Elizabeth Dale take the campaign against Chicago police commander Jon Burge, which retired cop Martin Preib calls dubious, at best, and work backwards to rewrite history, as part of the false exoneration (aka “innocence project”) industry, whose capital is Chicago, and demand more and more millions and billions of dollars in “reparations.”
This is a long, sordid story that goes back over 100 years, but it wasn’t until the 1960s that apologists for racist, black cut-throats set up political strongholds in all major American institutions.
Circa 1960, leading institutions openly committed a reversal of reality and morality. “Experts” spoke of racist, black serial killers as the victims of “police terror.”
Nicholas Stix
Nicholas Stix, Uncensored
Biography - Nicholas Stix
Award-winning, New York-based freelancer Nicholas Stix founded A Different Drummer magazine (1989-93). Stix has written for Die Suedwest Presse, New York Daily News, New York Post, Newsday, Middle American News, Toogood Reports, Insight, Chronicles, the American Enterprise, Campus Reports, VDARE, the Weekly Standard, Front Page Magazine, Ideas on Liberty, National Review Online and the Illinois Leader. His column also appears at Men's News Daily, MichNews, Intellectual Conservative, Enter Stage Right and OpinioNet. Stix has studied at colleges and universities on two continents, and earned a couple of sheepskins, but he asks that the reader not hold that against him. His day jobs have included washing pots, building Daimler-Benzes on the assembly-line, tackling shoplifters and teaching college, but his favorite job was changing his son's diapers.